Why the Response of Big Pharma to the COVID Pandemic Should Be Considered a Crime against Humanity

Last week Twitter nixed the account of Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine delivery technology. His offence? He shared a link to research by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance (CCCA) who have issued a damning report on the safety data behind the COVID jabs. The paper, titled ‘The Pfizer Inoculations for COVID-19: More Harm than Good’, is a devastating expose on the clinical trials behind the COVID shots and its subsequent deployment. Immediately tagged as disinformation by Twitter, the tweet was scrubbed and Malone’s account permanently suspended. What was in the report and why does it frighten Twitter’s gatekeepers?

Twitter’s policy on the dissemination of info relating to COVID is clearly stated on their website. Their concern is to cut down on “persistent conspiracy theories, alarmist rhetoric unfounded in research or credible reporting, and a wide range of false narratives and unsubstantiated rumors” that no doubt plague the site. Yet the report shared by the CCCA merely cites Pfizer’s own safety findings and therefore cannot be banished into any of the above categories. What’s clear from the step is that Twitter’s policy is being used to scrub the site of narratives that do not fit with the one peddled by Government and Big Pharma.

To insist that the CCCA’s findings can be automatically consigned to the dustbin of “conspiracy theory” or “alarmist rhetoric” is to turn a wilfully blind eye to science itself. It is this science that Malone, a virologist and immunologist, was banished from Twitter for sharing.

The CCCA, an alliance of some 500 “independent Canadian doctors, scientists and health care practitioners’, put out the paper that ripped the academic and medical rigour of the clinical trials that were employed in order to test and pass the COVID jab. I won’t go into the details, but I’ll sum up the findings briefly here:

• Pfizer’s own trials indicated an Absolute Risk Reduction against illness of only 1% by inoculation for COVID-19.
• Taking the vaccine increased adverse events (read ‘illness caused by the jab’) in trial patients by up to 300%.
• Twice as many trial participants who were inoculated died from cardiovascular complications compared to those who received the placebo.
• The shots were tested in the main on healthy participants, ignoring those who are at most risk from suffering complications from the vaccine. There is NO safety data for the elderly, pregnant women, those who are immunocompromised and others with underlying medical conditions. None.
• The trials proved conclusively that the vaccine caused, among other things, myocarditis, even in 5–11-year-olds, for whom there is questionable benefit in taking the shots. There is also no long-term safety data on jabs for children. Informed consent is therefore impossible.
• Pfizer’s clinical trials overwhelmingly proved HARM, not safety.
• The Pfizer safety report was largely written by those who are employed by or own stock in the company, a clear and enormous conflict of interest.

Given all this, how is it the jabs were passed for use by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration)? Well, could the revolving door between the FDA and the big players of Pharma have anything to do with it? Three former commissioners of the FDA now sit in top positions at Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and Moderna, which is great if you have an experimental drug that needs rapid authorization from the FDA, or if your goal is to appropriate billions in taxpayer dollars for your emergency pharmaceuticals.

We need investigations. People who own Pfizer stock writing the company’s safety reports? How is this not illegal?

What it comes down to is this: An insufficiently tested and clinically dangerous drug has been unleashed upon an unsuspecting public, and somehow our media and governments have been co-opted into selling it to us or outright pushing it down our throats (See what’s happening in Austria and other European countries), with blind disregard for emerging revelations concerning the safety data. Our own governments are complicit in forcing an unsafe treatment upon us. Make no mistake, at best they’re guilty of negligence, at worst they are criminally culpable for their rash and unjustified actions over the last twenty months. When all is said and done, who made the decisions: was it the doctors, or was it politicians who were lobbied by Big Pharma to push their product? Was the decision a medical one or a business one?

We need to know.

If you felt vulnerable to the COVID virus and you made a studied and informed decision to take the shot, and you feel safer for it, that’s all well. But if you felt pressured into taking the vaccine in order to keep a job or simply to assuage pressure from your peers, then you’ve been wronged, perhaps criminally so. And there are a small number of people out there who’ve become disgustingly rich by this enterprise, people who work for organisations with proven criminal track records.

I’ll say it again: You have been wronged.

Millions worldwide are the potential victims of a huge corporate scandal. Millions of children may have had their immune systems irreparably damaged by this bogus ‘vaccine’ rollout. It is global, it is pervasive, it is shameless. It is a Crime against Humanity and nothing less.

UPDATE: Only days after writing this a team from the UK includung Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice-president and chief scientist of Pfizer, brought a charge of crimes against humanity to the International Criminal Court in The Hague against multiple perpetrators, including: Albert Bourla,CEO pf Pfizer, Bill Gates and Boris Johnson.